G5: fix version-count copy; record the u-system namespace finding

'There are 1 saved versions' is exactly the sloppiness the vocabulary law
exists to catch. Copy is design material, not decoration.

G5.9 records something the live test surfaced: a repo created through
X-Service-Token lands in a 'u-system' namespace because the service caller has
no identity of its own. Correct for /internal plumbing, WRONG for anything a
person owns — the portal must pass an acting user and this cell must refuse to
create a user-owned project without one. Until then service-created repos are
ops artifacts, not customer data.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

DNA_STRAND_MASTER_PLAN.md

@@ -324,6 +324,13 @@ and landed in R2 at `lfs/34/2d/…`, with **no local `lfs/` directory on the hos
 - **G5.5** **Version history UI with one giant Undo.** Grandma-words throughout, and D-9 binds every string: "version", "save point", "restore" — **never "commit," never "a Git"** on this surface.
 - **G5.6** `POST /{id}/restore {version_seq}` — lossless, and itself a new version. **Undo is never destructive.**
 - **G5.7** Quota events double as storage-plan cross-sell hooks (§0.5).
+- **G5.9** ⚠️ **Service callers need an on-behalf-of identity.** Verified live on
+  2026-08-11: a repo created through `X-Service-Token` lands in a `u-system`
+  namespace, because the service caller has no identity of its own. That is
+  correct for `/internal/*` plumbing and **wrong for anything a person owns** —
+  the Cloud portal must pass the acting user, and this cell must refuse to
+  create a user-owned repo without one. Until then, service-created repos are
+  ops artifacts, not customer data.
 - **G5.8** *Accept — the strand's whole point in one test:* a Cloud folder is git-enabled, a second human is granted `writer`, that human edits a file through the portal, the owner restores the previous version, and **at no point does either user encounter the word "commit," "repo," "branch," or "Git."**
 
 ## Strand G6 — Git protocol surface

api/app/routes/repos.py

@@ -291,8 +291,12 @@ async def list_versions(
     return {
         "versions": versions,
         "count": len(versions),
+        # "There are 1 saved versions" is the kind of sloppiness the vocabulary
+        # law exists to catch. Copy is design material, not decoration (I-9).
         "speak": (
-            f"There are {len(versions)} saved versions of '{repo.display_name}'. "
+            f"'{repo.display_name}' has 1 saved version. You can go back to it."
+            if len(versions) == 1
+            else f"'{repo.display_name}' has {len(versions)} saved versions. "
             "You can go back to any of them."
             if versions
             else f"'{repo.display_name}' is empty so far."