4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kit OC5
e64a1b5fcb deps: install from uv.lock (hash-pinned) in the image and CI, never floating
All checks were successful
check / gate (push) Successful in 10s
canary / probe (push) Successful in 5s
The API image did 'pip install -e .' and CI 'pip install -e ".[dev]"':
every rebuild could ship newer fastapi/starlette/pydantic than CI tested
(Windy Cloud hit exactly this 09-23). uv.lock is cut to EXACTLY what prod
runs now (42 runtime pkgs, 0 differences; botocore/pyjwt held back to
prod's versions). Image: uv 0.12.5 exports, pip --require-hashes installs,
same layout. CI: uv sync --locked (also fails on a stale lock).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-23 15:25:18 -04:00
Grant Whitmer
8c4bdd2bc2 G7.3: setup-python on the act image, not a python image
Some checks failed
check / gate (push) Failing after 43s
Trading one wedge for another: running the job in python:3.12-bookworm fixed
the resolver spiral but broke checkout, because actions/checkout is a
JavaScript action and the official Python images carry no node — 'executable
file not found in $PATH'.

setup-python on the act image has both. Test now accepts either a pinned
container image or an explicit setup-python version, and still checks it
against pyproject's requires-python.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 11:16:00 -04:00
Grant Whitmer
980fc2dddd G7.3: pin Python 3.12 in CI and cap job runtime
Some checks failed
check / gate (push) Failing after 7s
The first real CI run wedged for 14 minutes. Not a network problem, not the
isolation work — catthehacker/ubuntu:act-22.04 ships Python 3.10.12 while this
project declares requires-python >=3.12, and pip answered that by backtracking
through the entire release history of every dependency looking for something
3.10-compatible. At 100% CPU, with -q hiding every line of it, and it would
have churned until the runner's 30m timeout.

A version mismatch presenting as a hang rather than an error is worth a test,
so there is one: the workflow's python image must satisfy pyproject's
requires-python, checked by parsing both rather than by eyeballing them.

Also: every job now has timeout-minutes. A wedged step should be a red check in
minutes, not an occupied runner for half an hour.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 11:13:39 -04:00
Grant Whitmer
5f717ef74b G7: CI runners with real isolation, and the gate as a workflow
Some checks failed
check / gate (push) Failing after 50s
I-5 says runners execute untrusted code and must be isolated by machine
boundary. act_runner needs a Docker daemon to start job containers, and the
tempting move — what every published example does — is to mount the host's
/var/run/docker.sock. That hands every workflow, including whatever a
transitive dependency's postinstall script feels like doing, the ability to
start a privileged container mounting / — root on Grant's workstation.

Instead the runner talks to its OWN dind daemon:
  - runner (TRUSTED, the act_runner daemon) sits on the forge network only to
    collect jobs from gitea:3000
  - dind and every job container it spawns are UNTRUSTED, on a private network
    with no route to the forge, its Postgres, or its .env
  - jobs cannot bind-mount from the daemon host (valid_volumes: []) and are not
    handed the runner's own socket (docker_host: -)
  - separate compose project, cpu/memory bounded — Veron 1 is Grant's
    workstation, not a dedicated build box

The gate itself now runs as a workflow, including the migration round-trip that
already caught two bugs review did not, and the I-12 check that a COMMIT_SHA
env override cannot change what /version reports.

Labels are explicit and pinned. A workflow naming a label nobody provides
queues forever and presents as a hung CI system rather than a typo — which is
what ubuntu-latest does on every windy-registry run today.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 10:39:05 -04:00