Read the sender rather than guessing: Eternitas generates the webhook secret at
registration time and pings the URL to prove reachability BEFORE returning that
secret. The ping IS signed — with a secret the receiver cannot possibly hold
yet. Unverifiable by construction, not by oversight.
Accepting it is safe because the event is definitionally a no-op: nothing read,
nothing written, acted:false. Every event that changes anything still requires a
valid HMAC. The alternative, skip_validation:true, would permanently disable
reachability checking for this platform to solve a one-time ordering problem.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Eternitas verifies a webhook URL answers BEFORE issuing the secret that signs
deliveries, so the very first request can never carry a signature — refusing it
makes registration impossible. Real chicken-and-egg, not a reason to disable
validation.
A probe is a request claiming no event and carrying no signature. Answering it
200 is honest: the endpoint exists and is ready. It changes nothing (acted:
false), and anything claiming to BE an event still goes through full HMAC
verification. Registering with skip_validation:true would have permanently
disabled a safety check to solve a one-time ordering problem.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
When a passport is revoked, every credential it holds here dies in one
transaction: tokens revoked, grants revoked. A revocation that takes effect
'eventually' is not a revocation.
Avoids two traps that each cost a sibling service a subscription that looked
wired and never once delivered:
1. strip the 'sha256=' prefix before comparing — comparing the decorated
header against a bare digest returns 401 forever
2. HMAC the RAW REQUEST BYTES, never a re-serialised body — JSON.stringify of
a parsed body reorders keys and changes whitespace, so the digest never
matches what the sender signed
Both fail silently from the sender's side: Eternitas records a delivery, the
receiver records a rejection, nobody notices for weeks.
Unset secret REFUSES rather than accepts — accepting unverified instructions
about identity is worse than missing them. And it never acknowledges a
revocation it could not apply; a 200 there is a security hole reporting success.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
