Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Grant Whitmer
14fb43b959 G7.4: advertise the fleet's runner labels, and correct my own doctrine
Some checks are pending
check / gate (push) Waiting to run
Surveyed ten repos: 36 of 36 ACTIVE workflows already say
runs-on: [self-hosted, linux, x64]. They were written for the self-hosted
runners that died when the repos went private — so advertising those three
labels makes every one of them runnable AS-IS. No workflow edits, no rewrites.

Correcting an earlier note in this plan: 'ban ubuntu-latest' was wrong as
stated. All 11 occurrences are tagged '# runner-lint-allow — CD/hosted-only;
disabled, manual until CD mission'. They are deliberately hosted-only and
deliberately off. They are correct as written and should not be 'fixed'.

I generalised that doctrine from one repo without surveying. The survey
disagreed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 19:53:44 -04:00
Grant Whitmer
6b96087554 G7: per-job networks — fixes service DNS and tightens isolation
Some checks failed
check / gate (push) Failing after 13m33s
The migration step failed with 'could not translate host name postgres'. The
Postgres service container was healthy; the job simply could not name it,
because service DNS aliases only exist on a per-job network and I had pinned
container.network to the flat 'bridge'.

That choice was wrong in both directions: it broke service containers AND it
was weaker isolation, since every concurrent job shared one bridge and could
see its neighbours. A per-job network is stricter and correct — and still has
no route to the forge, because these networks live inside the dind daemon,
which has no forge attachment at all.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 11:18:51 -04:00
Grant Whitmer
5f717ef74b G7: CI runners with real isolation, and the gate as a workflow
Some checks failed
check / gate (push) Failing after 50s
I-5 says runners execute untrusted code and must be isolated by machine
boundary. act_runner needs a Docker daemon to start job containers, and the
tempting move — what every published example does — is to mount the host's
/var/run/docker.sock. That hands every workflow, including whatever a
transitive dependency's postinstall script feels like doing, the ability to
start a privileged container mounting / — root on Grant's workstation.

Instead the runner talks to its OWN dind daemon:
  - runner (TRUSTED, the act_runner daemon) sits on the forge network only to
    collect jobs from gitea:3000
  - dind and every job container it spawns are UNTRUSTED, on a private network
    with no route to the forge, its Postgres, or its .env
  - jobs cannot bind-mount from the daemon host (valid_volumes: []) and are not
    handed the runner's own socket (docker_host: -)
  - separate compose project, cpu/memory bounded — Veron 1 is Grant's
    workstation, not a dedicated build box

The gate itself now runs as a workflow, including the migration round-trip that
already caught two bugs review did not, and the I-12 check that a COMMIT_SHA
env override cannot change what /version reports.

Labels are explicit and pinned. A workflow naming a label nobody provides
queues forever and presents as a hung CI system rather than a typo — which is
what ubuntu-latest does on every windy-registry run today.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 10:39:05 -04:00