131 read-only mirrors (cannot run Actions, zero deploy risk) + 12 writable with
CI and deploys disabled. Total size matches the measured GitHub archive exactly,
which is the confirmation the copy is complete.
Splits the two concerns cleanly: having a copy is safe and should cover
everything now; running code needs judgement and happens per repo.
windy-pro IS included as a mirror — the G11.5 caution is about making it
writable while six checkouts disagree on HEAD, not about holding a read-only
copy. The DR copy is now complete.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Six workflows deploy to production on push:. Windy Git now has a working
runner, so the next synced commit to main would have attempted a production
deploy FROM VERON 1. Their secrets are unset here so they would have failed —
but loudly, on every push, with any pre-SSH step still running.
All six now disabled_manually. Tests, lints and migration checks stay active:
they need no secrets, which is exactly why Phase 1 delivers CI value with
nothing to configure.
Same class of mistake as the push-mirror direction, caught before firing this
time rather than after.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phase 1 requires nothing from anyone: agents keep pushing to GitHub, a timer
syncs GitHub -> Windy Git every 15 minutes, CI runs on Veron against current
code. Phase 2 flips one repo at a time, only when that repo is idle.
Records the direction mistake honestly: the source of truth is wherever people
are actually typing, not wherever the plan says it should be.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9 repos migrated writable with push-mirrors to GitHub (sync_on_commit).
Full loop proven end to end: pushed a commit to Windy Git, its existing
workflow ran on Veron 1, and GitHub received the commit within 20s.
Documents the one rule the cutover creates: do NOT push directly to GitHub for
a migrated repo. The mirror makes GitHub match Windy Git, so a direct commit is
overwritten on the next sync, silently, with no conflict. One writer is the
point — two writers with no reconciliation is how you lose work you thought was
saved.
windy-pro deliberately excluded until its six-checkout / forked-counter
ambiguity is resolved by reading (G11.5).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
